Vann wrote:
I don't have to respond to your unprovoked attacks here. You proved your "lack of perspective" in the threads you're referring to, which is why you're not quoting from them... I get it...
And to say that if one person in an entire group says one thing, that it applies to everyone in that group even when none of the rest said it, is beyond any level of rational thought... There's not one way that could ever be made to even resemble a logical argument... Way to dig that hole deeper...
Spectacular...

Yeah I made my point with the whole Award thing I'm not going to keep repeating myself so if you can't understand why I would look down at people for that than thats your problem. Of course though I wouldn't want to have to justify trying to claim Video Evidence proves nothing and that wrestlers have no responsibility for their own actions either if I was claiming things that stupid.
Spec_Sun wrote:
I'm sitting back and enjoying XT dig himself into the largest ditch I've seen on this board. Even when presented with facts and clear arguments, he finds a way to twist logic, which in turn, becomes illogical statements from him. If we were both standing in the same area somewhere in earth and I stated that the sky was blue, XT would find a way to call me an idiot and before you know it, he would present a thesis (similar to the several he has presented here) on why he believes the sky is green.
Moreover, we've been through this before. As Afro mentioned, I don't like to discuss profit margins and revenue streams when it comes to professional wrestling, but I do make exceptions every now and then. Normally, I chime in when XT makes stupid economic statements that I can bare looking at no longer. There is a difference between revenue and profit. XT, you have still yet to understand that. I commend you on discussing revenue, but that is not what they made in 2011. Really, there was no need for you to even mention this in a thread relating to TNA, but I will comply. It was just another way for you to change the subject to fit your opinion, and you even failed to do that accurately.
The WWE were not profiting 400 million in 2011. That was their revenue. For anyone that wants to discuss economics, keep in mind that revenue is not the same as net income (profit). You have to take into account expenses. Despite mentioning that the company's revenue was 400 million, XT failed to mention the entire story, and continued to use his poor understanding of economics in attempt to validate his inaccurate and comical rant within this thread. Thus, digging his hole even deeper.
Spec seriously If you guys can't seperate two fucking arguments than who's the dumb ass you or me? CM Punk is the perfect example
1) I attack the character for being unlikable and weak in the ring as a face thats a wrestling opinion
2) Bring up the fact that CM Punk has been champion for six straight pay per views that saw drops in buyrates is an example of the fact that as much as you guys are claiming he's well liked that he's just not. That is using money and figures to back up my point.
There is two fucking arguments and of course you don't want to talk about money since the last time you did with Ric Flair you had a huge article come out that basically proved your a delusional idiot
The Boxman wrote:
Exactly why I didn't want to answer your stupid questions. Like I said it didn't matter who I put down you would trash them. Of course you don't know who Anthony Neese is, you don't watch TNA so I don't even know why you always have to trash us who do. Or ask me to answer questions. And for Bully Ray, he is in the best shape of his life at 40 and is cutting great promos with great in-ring work, and it after the title. Your top heel can be your top star going for the title WWE does it all the time. but you don't watch TNA so why do you even care.
And please tell me where WWE is going. Because nobody knows, nobody knows what could happen. You could lose writers, sponsors, TV deals, and tons more risks come with running a company. I know I run a company and any company could close its doors at any time ANY COMPANY is vulnerable to economy and it's changes.
Fact is you are just too closed minded and too much of a " know it all prick" to even have an actual conversation with. You hate TNA we get it, enough already. Leave us who watch TNA to do so without your uneducated asinine opinions.
1) I didn't trash anyone and what did I say that isn't a reasonable point?
2) 90% of this thread has been you saying i should talk about what I'm not watching and I didn't so now your complaining that I"m not watching Anthony Neese and I some how by saying have no idea who the fuck that even is, is some how an attack on you?
3)Again him being 40 is they are putting a lot of time investing in a guy who's all but done in probably four years and is some how your top heel when your top superstar is a heel. That makes no sense
4) Where WWE going? Okay well lets see Wrestlemania John Cena will finish his feud with Kane at Elimination Chamber, and take the embrace the heat stuff to help lay the ground work for the next 8 weeks of television. CM Punk or Chris Jericho will win the Chamber so they can do a Punk vs. Jericho feud at wrestlemania, Daniel Bryan will likely squeak out another victory at the Chamber so he can run with Sheamus at Wrestlemania 28. I could keep going but i think you get my point. There seems to be a rhyme and reason for everything WWE does, TNA I can't and rarely ever could say that.
Okay so I hate TNA because I ask you valid questions about the product? Hell most of this thread you've bounced around on attacks without being able to nail any of them down. Werent you trying to argue with me about Russo 2 days ago and now its another thirng and I"m sure soon it will be others. Just admit your a TNA mark and you don't have the ability to defend them so your attacking me.