xtremefalls43 wrote:
Thats my opinion just like losing to Triple H made him look like a bitch is your opinion, now I don't even remeber the match because guess what I didn't care enough to watch it since unlike a lot of people on this message board I don't watch pay per views I have no interest in seeing.
Neither do I. I didn’t see it till it came on Classics this month. And while it is an opinion, the fact is that he lost to a guy that doesn’t wrestle full-time, then magically put into a tag-team w/ the same guy he just had a very personal feud with, takes the pin for that team, and then the guy he never beats is the one to go on and get revenge against the guy that cost him the title (who he never got revenge against). Him being treated like a “bitch”
is my opinion, but the fact is he was not presented well for a guy (as you say below) “was champion or featured in the main event for most if not all of though shows”… All of that goes into how well his “push” goes. To ignore the situations he was put in is completely short-sighted…
xtremefalls43 wrote:
As for holding him off yeah 20/20 just like we could have said if they brought him back say Night of Champions and he lost all of his momentum. You have no idea how that would have turned out no matter what they did. They brought him back and still put a lot of effort into the character it failed. That happens but if CM punk was as great as some are trying to make him he'd be able to push through that.
I'm not talking about "what ifs" or "but ifs", XT... I'm talking about what they
actually did... The fact is, they didn’t hold off and it failed. And the “effort” they put into his character – as you say – is described above… Their effort was weak, so that’s the kind of character they got… It’s pretty simple… I'm not saying that if he went over Hunter strong it would have been huge... I'm saying that what they did made him look weak, so it's no wonder things turned out the way they did...
xtremefalls43 wrote:
Also he is dead as a doornail do you see anyone even talking about Jericho vs. CM Punk at Wrestlemania? I sure as hell haven't, its a blip on the radar and this continual need to avoid placing any blame on him for not being able to rise to the occasion is just laughable.
That's the thing, though, he should be as dead now, but his reactions and the merchandise he apparently sells say otherwise… But you’re right, the thing w/ Jericho is a blip on the radar. The main focus of WM this year is obviously Cena/Rock, w/ Taker/HHH a distant second… Everything else is treated as a blip… Not sure how you can blame that on Punk, too…
xtremefalls43 wrote:
As for your last part seriously your splitting hairs over words when in reality CM Punk was champion or featured in the main event for most if not all of though shows. If your getting the major push your responsible for the results
So was Cena… You could say Del Rio was, too… Yet it’s interesting that all your focus is squarely on Punk…
**And it's not "splitting hairs" when the "facts" you use to back up your points are inaccurate. It actually says a lot about the methods you use when debating...