IYH Wrestling

Message Board
It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 10:44 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 8:39 am
Posts: 9920
Location: Cal U
On last night's edition of IMPACT Wrestling, Austin Aries agreed to give up his X-Division title for a shot at Bobby Roode and the TNA World Title at Destination X. Aries did so on the condition that every year, at Destination X, whoever the X-Division champion is at the time will have the same choice (give up the title for a world title shot) as he did.

_________________
SHINE MY SHOES IF I WANT YOU TO
Image
https://www.facebook.com/TommyDDeLuca?ref=tn_tnmn
http://sbtbfanatic.tumblr.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:55 pm
Posts: 1574
This is one of those things that could easily forgoten, but i hope not.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 1:10 am
Posts: 7219
Location: Texas
I hope not either, It's sort of their "Money In The Bank". And IMO, puts more importance in the X-Division Title.

_________________
Image
Facebook - Fap World Order - IYH Wrestling MEMEs


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 11:55 pm
Posts: 1574
I dont know when i watched it felt like it did and it didnt. Like it gives a reason for people to want to win the title. But if you hold the title say in the month after Destination X it really seems like a lesser title. Its the title you can turn into a real title if you won a match. I think Bobby Rood adding to it, kinda hurt it to me. Its like a Disney Dollar that you can turn in for real money at the gate. No one thinks that Disney dollars are better then regular dollars.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:36 am
Posts: 39694
You know this is the problem with this promotion, its completely void of any reason for feuds anymore, are they that lazy to create a feud? Austin Aries is a hot character, Hulk Hogan is looking for someone to take Roode Down, put in a blender with a run in or a promo and you got yourself a feud, Instead we have to get into this melodramatic crapfest of every feud has to be about crap that hasn't little or nothing to do with with the show


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 1:10 am
Posts: 7219
Location: Texas
Terry Taylor wrote:
I dont know when i watched it felt like it did and it didnt. Like it gives a reason for people to want to win the title. But if you hold the title say in the month after Destination X it really seems like a lesser title. Its the title you can turn into a real title if you won a match. I think Bobby Rood adding to it, kinda hurt it to me. Its like a Disney Dollar that you can turn in for real money at the gate. No one thinks that Disney dollars are better then regular dollars.


I see it as, like I said before, a Money in the Bank kind of thing. Here's a title you can win, even a month before Destination-X and still have a chance at a World title shot. The importance is winning and keeping the title until the Destination-X PPV. It's the same concept as MITB, just a title instead of a briefcase.

_________________
Image
Facebook - Fap World Order - IYH Wrestling MEMEs


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:36 am
Posts: 39694
Money in the Bank? My ass, Money in the bank is a guranteed Contract for a Title match when you see fit for over a year. This is giving up your so called 2nd title which openly buries it for a match on a Pay Per View for the title. Come on


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:44 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:43 am
Posts: 30956
Location: Massachusetts
When Warrior won the world title he let his IC title go. It just makes common sense.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 11:30 pm
Posts: 2362
Location: Tampa
Really good stipulation, puts over how important the World Title is, that the person holding the #2 belt in the promotion is willing to give it up just for a World Title shot at the ppv. Pretty creative, I liked it a lot.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:36 am
Posts: 39694
Jack wrote:
When Warrior won the world title he let his IC title go. It just makes common sense.


yes after he won the title, it was a big deal that Warrior had WWE and IC championship If I remeber correctly no one else has done it sense. Don't you think it'd be more value to the title and storyline to have Aries come out and say I am proving myself in the X-Division and what better way to prove that than at Destination X I challenge Bobby Roode for the TNA Championship and for the first time a true wrestler will have both the X-Division and TNA Championship. Bobby Roode comes out makes a big stink about how he's a no one you set the match up Roode squeaks by with another cheap victory and then you seperate.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 10:37 pm
Posts: 7159
Location: Chappaqua, New York
Its 22 years later but it still kinda puzzles me that it was "Title for Title" if the IC Title was going to be vacated either way.

_________________
The Irresistible Force meets the Immovable Object
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 1:10 am
Posts: 7219
Location: Texas
xtremefalls43 wrote:
Money in the Bank? My ass, Money in the bank is a guranteed Contract for a Title match when you see fit for over a year. This is giving up your so called 2nd title which openly buries it for a match on a Pay Per View for the title. Come on


I said it was sort of like money in the bank, not exactly. Fucking read before you spout your negative bullshit. It's the same kind of concept. Do you really not see you have an unhealthy TNA obsession?

_________________
Image
Facebook - Fap World Order - IYH Wrestling MEMEs


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:36 am
Posts: 39694
Boxman wrote:
xtremefalls43 wrote:
Money in the Bank? My ass, Money in the bank is a guranteed Contract for a Title match when you see fit for over a year. This is giving up your so called 2nd title which openly buries it for a match on a Pay Per View for the title. Come on


I said it was sort of like money in the bank, not exactly. Fucking read before you spout your negative bullshit. It's the same kind of concept. Do you really not see you have an unhealthy TNA obsession?


ITS NOTHING like the Money in the Bank not even remotely besides you get a title shot at the end of it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 9:48 am
Posts: 4761
Location: San Antone...
I don't mind the idea...

_________________
Image
Donny: "It's Dirk fucking Benedict!"... Dirk: "I seldom use my middle name."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 2:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 1:10 am
Posts: 7219
Location: Texas
xtremefalls43 wrote:
Boxman wrote:
xtremefalls43 wrote:
Money in the Bank? My ass, Money in the bank is a guranteed Contract for a Title match when you see fit for over a year. This is giving up your so called 2nd title which openly buries it for a match on a Pay Per View for the title. Come on


I said it was sort of like money in the bank, not exactly. Fucking read before you spout your negative bullshit. It's the same kind of concept. Do you really not see you have an unhealthy TNA obsession?


ITS NOTHING like the Money in the Bank not even remotely besides you get a title shot at the end of it


you just contradicted yourself by saying it's not remotely close and then pointing out they BOTH have title shots involved. It's a title instead of a briefcase.

_________________
Image
Facebook - Fap World Order - IYH Wrestling MEMEs


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:36 am
Posts: 39694
Boxman wrote:
you just contradicted yourself by saying it's not remotely close and then pointing out they BOTH have title shots involved. It's a title instead of a briefcase.


Seriously learn to do a fucking comparision this is almost as dumb as the Ernest Miller vs Brodius Clay idea. Lets take the most basic concepts and pretend they have anything to do with each other. Money in the Bank is a multiman Ladder Match that ends with someone winning a contract to use when he feels like, this isn't a concept match its just some jack off handing over one belt for a shot at another at Destination X they aren't alike remotely


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:23 pm
Posts: 9365
Location: Wales
I agree with XT to an extent that its lazy, but it puts a of of importance on the X Division title, gives the wrestlers more reason to hold the belt especially around this time of year and to fight to hold onto it as well.

_________________
Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:36 am
Posts: 39694
but do you really think next year when they as usual forget about the division and they have someone like Kid Kash holding the belt there going to do this over again? Austin Aries is a stand out in a irrelevant division so I wouldn't hold my breath this concept will last


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:23 pm
Posts: 9365
Location: Wales
My job isn't to see into the future.

_________________
Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:36 am
Posts: 39694
Fair enough

However this whole thing comes back to a common pattern they keep doing in TNA of making these things completely devoid of an actual storyline and just making everything be a gay reality show and over complicate things that really don't need to be over complicated


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:23 pm
Posts: 9365
Location: Wales
Well it does happen with Money in the Bank as well, they have Edge come out and Spear Cena/Taker and win the belt out of nowhere and come up with a story later, or have Kane beat Chavo and come up with one after the fact. rarely do they build into it like with RVD. But I don't think this is complicated, it has its flaw of "why wouldn't the X-Division champ take the World title shot" but it has a very good shot of elevating a guy.

_________________
Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 1:10 am
Posts: 7219
Location: Texas
xtremefalls43 wrote:
Fair enough

However this whole thing comes back to a common pattern they keep doing in TNA of making these things completely devoid of an actual storyline and just making everything be a gay reality show and over complicate things that really don't need to be over complicated


You are really talking about when Russo was writing, yes they had some story-lines that just faded away, that's true. But why not just give them a chance and see where the new creative team takes it. Seriously dude, TNA has been a solid show the past 2 months when it comes to their story-lines making sense. It's just starting to take a turn for the best. All we can do is see what happens next year.

_________________
Image
Facebook - Fap World Order - IYH Wrestling MEMEs


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:36 am
Posts: 39694
Afro wrote:
Well it does happen with Money in the Bank as well, they have Edge come out and Spear Cena/Taker and win the belt out of nowhere and come up with a story later, or have Kane beat Chavo and come up with one after the fact. rarely do they build into it like with RVD. But I don't think this is complicated, it has its flaw of "why wouldn't the X-Division champ take the World title shot" but it has a very good shot of elevating a guy.


Well the WWE thing with the Money in the Bank I've said a few times there getting lazy with it and need to have someone finally lose. The difference however is this is once a year

TNa has gotten to the point where its EVERY show feuds aren't based on conflict anymore there based on Gutchecks, and Callout nights, and Whatever that stupid segment Hogan does every month, is it really so hard to give Austin Aries a Microphone and have him openly challenge the Worlds Champion? I think the X-Division champion should challenge Roode and they'll probably have a hell of a match but instead of basing it off a stupid game show concept again why not just have a storyline and run with it. I don't understand why they have to complicate it with stupid concepts and game show tatics. Most likely TNA isn't going to build this around Austin Aries wanting to face Bobby Roode it'll be based on Aries giving up the x-division championship to get a match


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:36 am
Posts: 39694
Boxman wrote:
xtremefalls43 wrote:
Fair enough

However this whole thing comes back to a common pattern they keep doing in TNA of making these things completely devoid of an actual storyline and just making everything be a gay reality show and over complicate things that really don't need to be over complicated


You are really talking about when Russo was writing, yes they had some story-lines that just faded away, that's true. But why not just give them a chance and see where the new creative team takes it. Seriously dude, TNA has been a solid show the past 2 months when it comes to their story-lines making sense. It's just starting to take a turn for the best. All we can do is see what happens next year.


when there driving down a dead end like they clearly are right now why would you just cheer them on as they do it and this booking squad is just as short sighted as Russo. As Russo put over the entertaininment aspect way too much these guys are putting over reality wresting too much. Is it too hard to have a feud based on Austin Aries in a Tag Team match lets say pins Roode and he developes a back and forth with the Champion. Is that too hard to ask for? No what were going to get is another feud based on game show tatics

While all that goes on they are setting James Storm's title run to be dead on arrival


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:23 pm
Posts: 9365
Location: Wales
Well I think its more plausible he'd get a shot because he's X Division champion rather than calling someone out, surely its better to have some retainable value like being a Champion before getting a shot rather than randomly getting one because you had five minutes on a microphone, I know wrestling is largely based around that but Aries and Roode have no history together that I can remember.

_________________
Image Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: duckman187 and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group