IYH Wrestling

The Wrestling Observer Newsletter is reporting the angle where three masked men attacked Sting two weeks ago on Impact is a way to get Sting off television.

TNA needed a way to get Sting off television without people asking why he isn't going to be involved in the Bound For Glory series.

As of now, TNA doesn't know who they are going to have be revealed as the three men. It is expected the storyline will be put on hold for a little bit.
Credit: Wrestlezone

This has fucking awful idea written all over it. How do you not plan this out before you do it?

Damn that is a real shame , i was so looking forward to seeing who thoses 3 guys are.

_________________
SHINE MY SHOES IF I WANT YOU TO

it's the 90's
https://www.facebook.com/TommyDDeLuca?ref=tn_tnmn
http://sbtbfanatic.tumblr.com/

Didn't the BFG series start that week anyway? He wasn't involved so why do they need to explain?

_________________

Look everybody does not have to be in the BFG series.

_________________
SHINE MY SHOES IF I WANT YOU TO

it's the 90's
https://www.facebook.com/TommyDDeLuca?ref=tn_tnmn
http://sbtbfanatic.tumblr.com/

Why is it that you always question the Observer on how they'd this stuff out when it comes to the WWE and not TNA?

_________________

Because usually its a pretty flimsy argument, Randy Orton was going to win the Royal Rumble because it was in St. Louis.....that was what they were going with. Also TNA has done this before, Samoa Joe being kidnapped ring a bell? I'm still waiting to hear where he was

Joe was eating, a lot......

To quote Scott Steiner, He's FAT!

So you're telling me that TNA not knowing who the group is believable? yet anything WWE has reported is unbelievable?

_________________

Again afro when you have multiple examples of TNA doing this its very believable they'd start a storyline without a finish again Samoa Joe being kidnapped was a perfect example

That news article is absolutely pointless. The angle was made to take Sting off TV? Not shit, Sherlock. No information as to who the three people are. Pointless to even post it.

The news sites post eye catching headlines, because they want people to hit the new links so they get more hits, more people seeing the ads on the site, more money for them.

_________________


"After our match at Wrestlemania, Undertaker, the only 'streak' that'll be left is in your underpants." - CM Punk

Brainz is on a roll today!

The story is that TNA likely doesn't have an end game to a storyline they started not Sting being taken off TV and no information about the three people was the point

Typical TNA, starting a storyline with no endgame...What kinda morons would do that..

_________________

So rather than judge based on news source you judge based on how believable the story is? interesting way of distinguishing credibility on news pieces.

_________________

No I also judge on the source Observer has more rope than say a PWI that usually goes off a story as "CM Punk has heat according to a source no one realy knows for sure why but he's supposed to be in the Dog House come Raw."

and Beef WWE does this too, i'm not saying they don't.

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=28119
"Source F4Wonline"
How is this so hard for you to understand?

_________________

Afro what is your point? I really don't get what your trying to say

Because you use an example of why the Observer sucks to prove that the Observer is correct in this case.

_________________

no I'm saying When your logical of Orton winning the rumble was based on it was in St. Louis I couldn't take that very seriously. However in terms of its history Observer is more reliable than 90% of the Dirtsheets out there and when you add that with the fact that TNA has done this type of things multiple times in the past its a very believable report

It doesn't make much sense to me that you would say this is true yet use an example from the same news source to say why other dirtsheets suck and why this is more believable yet has just as much information and no clear evidence of its sourcing point, you shouldn't just consider the site you should consider how much information of the source is present and it's clearly evidenced that there's not much of that.

_________________

At the end of the day if you went to all of the dirtsheets, they would have about 90% of the same articles. The other 10% is columns by that site. They all report the same crap. Trust me, I look at them all day. Same story, different title over and over again.

_________________

Facebook - Fap World Order - IYH Wrestling MEMEs

Edge beat up the Laptop, thats just like Big Jonny get fired. Its the same thing i dont see how you say it had no ending

Didn't the laptop come back after Edge beat it up? Not for long, only a couple of weeks I think.

_________________

Facebook - Fap World Order - IYH Wrestling MEMEs

That's like reporting O.J Simpson is black, Trish Stratus has big tits. It's a default. It's what they've always done. Just like how they had Samoa Joe kidnapped, only to come back a couple of weeks later and have zero follow up and the annoucer, when asked what he's to say about it, was told 'oops, we forgot to come up with a finish for that.'

News isn't called NEWs by accident. They reported the OLDs.

_________________


"After our match at Wrestlemania, Undertaker, the only 'streak' that'll be left is in your underpants." - CM Punk