Afro wrote:
So what you're saying is you'd rather take the opinions of Wrestleview or the Observer than people on here who you converse with about wrestling on a regular basis, and I actually disagree I'm not a jaded internet fan I'm one of those disenfranchised fans which both companies should be trying to goad back into watching their products on a regular basis, the only wrestling I've seen in the last 46 days is the 50 minute Rumble.
First off I don't listen to the observer or read the observer so lets get that stretch out of the way dispite this desperate need for some to tie me into them. Also why would i take say this message board's opinion on wrestling serious? Let see
1) Nikhil and others argued that TNA wrestlers were paid well even after I proved that you could make more working at Burger King as a manager. Then a couple weeks later we saw the Jesse Neal Foodstamps tweet.
2) Probably a good 60% of this message board argued that Ric flair wasn't with TNA because he was desperate for money but because he loved the business. 6 month's later a Huge article comes out basically blasting Flair as a irresponsible desperate manchild who has blown his fortune and was working for TNA for the money. Why didn't I bring this evidence to the debate? Oh wait I did including showing a actual video of Ric Flair ripping TNA apart and saying he'd never work for them and the Genius that is Vann said video evidence wasn't proof.
3) Probably all but 3 people on this message say they should turn John Cena heel despite not being able to answer the simple question of who's going to replace, and who would he and the new number one faces feud with after.
4)Spec Sun Swore that Randy Orton was a reasonable #1 Face replacement for John Cena and six months later he went on to have a dead title run on Smackdown as the Number One Face and almost reached Impact Level ratings.
5) I think it was a good 3 or 4 years of being told I was an idiot because I said TNA would be crazy to move to Mondays and when they finally did all you sat there with your thumbs up your asses completely in a daze as to why it failed.
6) I was told i wasn't being fair when I correctly stated that Eric Bishoff and Hulk Hogan would do nothing for TNA and were overrated and I remeber people starting to try and claim that Eric wasn't as responsible for WCW's failures as people made him out to be.
7) This isn't a knock on Jack but during the Wrestling awards in 2010 this is the same show that had Teh Nexus angle voted the best and worst angle of the year
8) Now this wasn't In Your Head's board but I know some members were involved when They gave me shit for rightfully saying the America's Most Wanted wasn't a top 10 tag team
9) Lets see Vann thinks that every match results matters despite no evidence to that point
10) I've seen multiple members refere to wrestling as a sport I mean do I need to say more?
I could keep rolling but i hope you get my point as to why I don't take members of this message board or any for that matter very serious. People are over reactive morons who don't understand the basic concepts of storylines and building characters. They lack complete perspective. Even in your response Afro you made my point that your jaded. You said both companies should be trying ot goad you back into their products and fans like you. Why? Now TNA I can make an argument but WWE? They are a financially successful company that has learned to brand its product and characters to have clear enjoyment of their fanbase. WWE will likely have a 400 Million Dollar Revenue in 2011 and they should be concerned with people like you why?
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
