IYH Wrestling

Message Board
It is currently Thu Jun 20, 2013 4:32 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 1:10 am
Posts: 7639
Location: Texas
Vince McMahon was said to be furious with Brock Lesnar, following Lesnar's appearance at UFC 146. While at the event, Lesnar had a meeting with the UFC's Dana White, who said the meeting did not go well.

Word is that Triple H had to talk McMahon out of doing something drastic to deal with Lesnar. Triple H vs. Lesnar is still scheduled for WWE Summerslam, and Triple H has been working hard so that the match is not cancelled. Some feel that this is all a sign that Triple H will be winning the match at the PPV.

Credit: WrestlingObserver.com

_________________
Image
Facebook - Fap World Order - IYH Wrestling MEMEs


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 8:39 am
Posts: 10196
Location: Cal U
Sounds right i dont think Triple H has ever had a match with Lesnar.

_________________
Convinced Vince to make me a Main-Eventer
Image
https://www.facebook.com/TommyDDeLuca?ref=tn_tnmn
http://sbtbfanatic.tumblr.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:36 am
Posts: 40194
They better start doing something with these two I'm really bored with Brock not being around.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 1:10 am
Posts: 7639
Location: Texas
I thought they would have at least brought out Paul Heyman a couple of times just to further the story-line.

_________________
Image
Facebook - Fap World Order - IYH Wrestling MEMEs


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 8:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 6:45 am
Posts: 15819
Location: BrightWave, USA
Seems pointless to have Lesnar lose every match during his comeback.

_________________
Image

B. Spec_Productions, Inc. - Be Spectacular
"I Can Dream About You" - Dan Hartman (1984)
http://www.youtube.com/MrBrightWave
http://www.youtube.com/SpectacularSunset
IYH is bringing the moniker, professional wrestling, back to form!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:36 am
Posts: 40194
Spec_Sun wrote:
Seems pointless to have Lesnar lose every match during his comeback.

why?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:48 pm
Posts: 2672
Because it, with each lose, weakens him. If you want him to lose, you want to hold it back for the biggest stage, Wrestlemania, with is around the culmination of his WWE contract.

_________________
Image

"After our match at Wrestlemania, Undertaker, the only 'streak' that'll be left is in your underpants." - CM Punk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:36 am
Posts: 40194
Brainz wrote:
Because it, with each lose, weakens him. If you want him to lose, you want to hold it back for the biggest stage, Wrestlemania, with is around the culmination of his WWE contract.


Or you get to the realization that Brock Lesnar is a royal pain in the ass and clearly if estimates are right about Extreme Rules not really hammering home buyrates yet. Look Lesnar vs. Cena was an amazing match and will probably be up there for match of the year but that doesn't change the fact is he really worth the time and the investment at this point? ALso why put him over I bet you come Wrestlemania next year Brock Lesnar will be gone again so if I'm WWE I'm getting the rub and calling it a night with him


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:53 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:43 am
Posts: 31097
Location: Massachusetts
What are you talking about it ? It got almost double the buys of the PPV the year before.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:36 am
Posts: 40194
Jack wrote:
What are you talking about it ? It got almost double the buys of the PPV the year before.

jack what number are you getting that from? The only estimates because lets remeber the actual number has not been released was a 250-260k range which while is a nice jump from 209,000 from last year's April Show is still not double of what he's getting

Also again Brock Lesnar is a royal pain in the ass who could split at any minute to begin with so I wouldn't feel the need if I was WWE to do him favors either


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:49 pm
Posts: 904
Location: New Delhi, INDIA
I prefer Lesnar to the shit wwe peddles 9 times out of 10. The rock was shit in his comeback, everything about wwe was shit, only Lesnar seemed awesome an actually made what he was involved in seem special.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 6:19 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:43 am
Posts: 31097
Location: Massachusetts
In the Observer it was over 120,000 more buys. Even at your 60,000 more buys how is that a failure especially since PPV buys keep dropping.

Why even sign someone if you don't want to push him ? That's idiotic.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 6:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:36 am
Posts: 40194
Jack wrote:
In the Observer it was over 120,000 more buys. Even at your 60,000 more buys how is that a failure especially since PPV buys keep dropping.

Why even sign someone if you don't want to push him ? That's idiotic.


just because he loses to your top talent doesn't mean he's being buried

I don't know if 60,000 more is a failure because its not but I'd be disapointed by it. This guy was drawing huge numbers for UFC I'm sure they expect that, but if say Triple H vs. Lesnar draws average numbers it may be sign. I just don't feel right now like there is a point of Brock Lesnar being there and it could be because he's been off TV for over a month but the whole everything stops on account of Lesnar being around seems off to me


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 2:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:47 am
Posts: 110
Location: The U.K
xtremefalls43 wrote:
Jack wrote:
In the Observer it was over 120,000 more buys. Even at your 60,000 more buys how is that a failure especially since PPV buys keep dropping.

Why even sign someone if you don't want to push him ? That's idiotic.


just because he loses to your top talent doesn't mean he's being buried

I don't know if 60,000 more is a failure because its not but I'd be disapointed by it. This guy was drawing huge numbers for UFC I'm sure they expect that, but if say Triple H vs. Lesnar draws average numbers it may be sign. I just don't feel right now like there is a point of Brock Lesnar being there and it could be because he's been off TV for over a month but the whole everything stops on account of Lesnar being around seems off to me



Maybe its just the fact that no one in wwe draws anymore face it troll wwe is garbage stick to stacking shelves at the blockbusters

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 2:52 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:43 am
Posts: 31097
Location: Massachusetts
It's stupid to bring him in and just have him lose every match. You can get a lot of big matches on PPV out of him then have him lose the big match on the way out. It's simple booking.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 6:04 pm
Posts: 11129
Yea, it dose seem weird. I mean I kind of understand having him lose to Cena but why not have him beat someone else first? If he starts losing to HHH and people like that I think it's really silly.

But having said all that, this is WWE. They care way more about holding grudges and embarrassing people than they do putting on a show that will make a lot of money.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:36 am
Posts: 40194
Jack wrote:
It's stupid to bring him in and just have him lose every match. You can get a lot of big matches on PPV out of him then have him lose the big match on the way out. It's simple booking.


But you can't if he doesn't come in to work......thats the point clearly if all the information we know which could easily be a huge work admittedly is true than its a ticking time bomb. Brock Lesnar also has lost a match not every match a match which he dominated in so lets not pretend he's suddenly leaving. If you have only two apperances a month and your burning through your Wrestlemania apperances WWE is not going to be able to build anything. I think if that 2 apperances thing is true it was a HORRIBLE decision


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 3:36 am
Posts: 40194
Jack wrote:
It's stupid to bring him in and just have him lose every match. You can get a lot of big matches on PPV out of him then have him lose the big match on the way out. It's simple booking.


But you can't if he doesn't come in to work......thats the point clearly if all the information we know which could easily be a huge work admittedly is true than its a ticking time bomb. Brock Lesnar also has lost a match not every match a match which he dominated in so lets not pretend he's suddenly leaving. If you have only two apperances a month and your burning through your Wrestlemania apperances WWE is not going to be able to build anything. I think if that 2 apperances thing is true it was a HORRIBLE decision


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: JFTR, Madman Maple, PiperFan342 and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group