xtremefalls43 wrote:
Boxman wrote:
Again, you are talking about a different writing team that has been putting together some good shows the past couple of months.
And you don't know what is going to happen the next couple of weeks.
Does everything have to conform to the way you would "Book" it or it's wrong? Or if it isn't the way you see WWE booking it it's wrong? This is how they are doing it, and since you don't watch, you shouldn't even give a shit. (Which we all know you do)
I want TNA succeed, thats what you don't get. I just won't blindly blow them when they are setting themselves up for failure and I'm not talking about a different writing team. TNA's writing team created a suprise on Thursday and how did that go? They booked one of the worst swerves and storylines in the past two years which for TNA is saying a lot.
Heres is what I do know, now the storyline isn't Austin Aries is stepping up to take on Robert Roode and Roode mocks him or whatever. The stoyrline is Hulk Hogan is making him give up his title to challenge Robert Roode. So your conflict is about giving up a belt, not the actual feud. I also know that this big angle which should deliver an actual watchable Main Event opened Impact so AJ and Dixie could run the worst storyline of the year and you could throw 8 short matches.
You have a strange way of showing you want TNA to succeed. Yeah, they have a shitty angle going on right now, makes them no different that any other wrestling company. And lets face it, that wasn't the worst swerve they have pulled in the last two years. The "They" angle comes to mind.
That story-line could be looked at a few different ways. As a fan, it's a good angle. As someone who really doesn't watch and just reads results, it may seem like that. And c'mon both companies have opened shows with PPV quality matches. It seems to be the norm now.